Quantcast
Channel: OTMFAQ Forums
Viewing all 2772 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

The network adapter couldn't establish the connection

May 13, 2015, 12:07 am
$
0
0
Hi Gurus,

If anyone have any idea on below connectivity issue

we are not able to establish the connection to DB adapter while fetching the data from eBS database.

getting below error while performing the same in the BPEL service.

<part name="summary">

<summary>Exception occured when binding was invoked. Exception occured during invocation of JCA binding: "JCA Binding execute of Reference operation 'AuthenticateTicket' failed due to: Could not create/access the TopLink Session. This session is used to connect to the datastore. Caused by java.sql.SQLRecoverableException: IO Error: The Network Adapter could not establish the connection. You may need to configure the connection settings in the deployment descriptor (i.e. DbAdapter.rar#META-INF/weblogic-ra.xml) and restart the server. This exception is considered retriable, likely due to a communication failure. To classify it as non-retriable instead add property nonRetriableErrorCodes with value "17002" to your deployment descriptor (i.e. weblogic-ra.xml). To auto retry a retriable fault set these composite.xml properties for this invoke: jca.retry.interval, jca.retry.count, and jca.retry.backoff. All properties are integers. ". The invoked JCA adapter raised a resource exception. Please examine the above error message carefully to determine a resolution. </summary>

</part>

<part name="detail">

<detail>IO Error: The Network Adapter could not establish the connection</detail>

</part>

<part name="code">

<code>17002</code>

</part>


Error Codes


Thanks & Regards,
Chandu
↧
Search

Temperature controlled equipments

May 13, 2015, 2:07 am
$
0
0
Hi,

I have requirement as Vehicle should have 3 compartments (Freezer, Chiller and Dry) each with 50%,30% and 20% space respectively and consolidated shipment should have all 3 types of items in 3 compartments in 1 Vehicle.


I have configured below
"Created 3 Temperature Control ID and assigned the same in 3 compartments of Equipment group. Created commodities for each temp controlled ID and assigned these commodities to respective Items".

Created 3 Orders from Location A->E,B->E and C->E via consolidation point D.

Now when I plan the shipment with bulk plan it is building shipments in such a way that all 3 types of items goes into 1st compartment only and 2nd 3rd remains empty.

Can anyone pls assist on this?


I am using Version 6.3.4.


Thanks,
Mahantesh
Xchanging
↧
↧

Air Scheduling

May 13, 2015, 2:12 am
$
0
0
Hi

Can anyone help by providing document for AIR SCHEDULE.

Thanks
Shankar
↧

Error while adding predicate in VPD

May 13, 2015, 2:33 am
$
0
0
Hi All,

When i am trying to add a predicate in the VPD it is throwing below error:

ORA-12899: value too large for column "GLOGOWNER"."EXTERNAL_PREDICATE"."PREDICATE" (actual: 2185, maximum: 2000)

Query:
INSERT_USER = SYS_CONTEXT ('gl_user_ctx','LOG_IN_USER_GID') OR (EXISTS (SELECT 'X' FROM location_corporation lc, contact_corporation cc, contact c, OB_line ol WHERE lc.CORPORATION_GID=cc.CORPORATION_GID AND cc.contact_gid=c.contact_gid AND (lc.LOCATION_GID=ol.SOURCE_LOCATION_GID OR lc.LOCATION_GID=ol.DEST_LOCATION_GID) AND ol.ORDER_BASE_GID=OB_ORDER_BASE.ORDER_BASE_GID AND c.Gl_user_gid=Vpd.GET_GL_USER)) OR (EXISTS (SELECT 'X' FROM location_corporation lco,contact_corporation cor,contact co,OB_ship_unit osu WHERE lco.CORPORATION_GID=cor.CORPORATION_GID AND cor.contact_gid=co.contact_gid AND (lco.LOCATION_GID=osu.SOURCE_LOCATION_GID OR lco.LOCATION_GID=osu.DEST_LOCATION_GID) AND osu.ORDER_BASE_GID=OB_ORDER_BASE.ORDER_BASE_GID AND co.Gl_user_gid=Vpd.GET_GL_USER)) OR (EXISTS (SELECT 'X' FROM contact_corporation u1,contact u2,(SELECT contact_gid, MIN(insert_date) tm FROM contact_corporation GROUP BY contact_gid) t1, contact_corporation o1, contact o2,(SELECT contact_gid, MIN(insert_date) om FROM contact_corporation GROUP BY contact_gid) t2 WHERE u1.contact_gid=u2.contact_gid AND u2.Gl_user_gid=Vpd.GET_GL_USER AND t1.tm=u1.insert_date AND t1.contact_gid=u2.contact_gid AND o1.contact_gid=o2.contact_gid AND o2.Gl_user_gid=OB_ORDER_BASE.insert_user AND t2.om=o1.insert_date AND t2.contact_gid=o2.contact_gid AND u1.corporation_gid = o1.corporation_gid )) OR (EXISTS (select 'X' from contact c,contact_corporation coo,ob_involved_party oip where c.contact_gid=coo.contact_gid AND oip.INVOLVED_PARTY_CONTACT_GID=coo.contact_gid AND ob_order_base.order_base_gid=oip.order_base_gid AND oip.INVOLVED_PARTY_QUAL_GID='REQUESTER' AND coo.corporation_gid IN (select cor.corporation_gid from contact_corporation cor,contact c where cor.contact_gid=c.contact_gid AND c.gl_user_gid=Vpd.GET_GL_USER) AND ob_order_base.insert_user LIKE 'external%')) OR (EXISTS (SELECT 'X' FROM OB_REFNUM OBR, CONTACT_PROFILE_DETAIL CPD , CONTACT C1 WHERE OBR.OB_REFNUM_QUAL_GID = 'OB_SEGMENT' AND OBR.OB_REFNUM_VALUE = GLOG_UTIL.REMOVE_DOMAIN(CPD.CONTACT_PROFILE_GID) AND OBR.ORDER_BASE_GID = OB_ORDER_BASE.ORDER_BASE_GID AND CPD.CONTACT_GID = C1.CONTACT_GID AND C1.Gl_user_gid=Vpd.GET_GL_USER))

Kindly help in this regard...
↧

Kit assignments (driver and equipment)

May 13, 2015, 7:51 am
$
0
0
Hello,

For OTM 6.3.2. we've found the following Kit Assignment Enhancement:
Kit is defined as the relationship between driver, power unit and equipment.
For kit assignments, the previously existing requirements for location asset inventory are relaxed. There is no longer a need to set up and maintain location asset inventory buckets and bucket values if kits are all that are being assigned.

There is instruction for setup (attached). But after completing all this steps we still get the exception when run Assign Driver action -> Show Options. OTM shows correct list of drivers, but when we choose driver we get the java.lang.NullPointerException.

Any recommendations about setting up this case?
Attached Files
↧
↧

Date Emphasis defaults

May 13, 2015, 12:35 pm
$
0
0
Is there a default that can configured for Order Release constraint 'Date Emphasis'?
↧

Build Shipment With Valid Itineraries

May 13, 2015, 2:44 pm
$
0
0
Hello,


I want to do the bulk plan with order movements but using the Build Shipment With Valid Itineraries option as a default parameter.


Have any want know if there is a way to put this action as a default??


Regards
↧

Can Order Movement Bulk Plan work with Depot?

May 13, 2015, 3:24 pm
$
0
0
Can Order Movement Bulk Plan work with Depot?
I tried bulk planning from order release and as expected, a source depot is added to my shipment. Thus my shipment looks like this: Source Depot > Origin Location > Destination Location.

However when i use the same Order Release, and everything remains the same, but bulk plan from the Order Movement created from this Order Release, the source depot is not added.

Anyone has experience in this? Appreciate your help. Thanks!
↧
Search

Can Order Movement Bulk Plan work with Depot?

May 13, 2015, 3:25 pm
$
0
0
Can Order Movement Bulk Plan work with Depot?
I tried bulk planning from order release and as expected, a source depot is added to my shipment. Thus my shipment looks like this: Source Depot > Origin Location > Destination Location.

However when i use the same Order Release, and everything remains the same, but bulk plan from the Order Movement created from this Order Release, the source depot is not added.

Anyone has experience in this? Appreciate your help. Thanks!
↧
↧

OTM 6.3.1 Integratiion with R12.2.4

May 13, 2015, 11:18 pm
$
0
0
Hi All

We are in process of upgrading to 6.3.1 OTM and we already have upgraded our EBS to R12.2.4.

Just wanted to check what are the standard complications or glitches in integrating these two systems if any.

What all are the standard interfaces too.


Any repository or knowledge bank would also be highly appreciated.

Seeking help on this.

BR,
Ayush Saxena
9599230677
↧

Status enroute_enroute

May 14, 2015, 8:00 am
$
0
0
Which status code and event group put the status ENROUTE_ENROUTE in the shipment?
↧

Driver NAT/NAL Update Through Agents

May 14, 2015, 10:25 am
$
0
0
I am trying to update driver NAT/NALs using agent actions. I can insert a new manual NAT/NAL into the driver_assignment table. Unfortunately, even though I insert a new sequence number, OTM throws an error on all future driver assignments saying that the sequence number is not unique.

I looked in the bn_sequence table and do not see an entry for the driver_assignment table that can be updated. Does anybody know what can be done to fix this?
↧

Table History Events in Shipment

May 14, 2015, 10:58 am
$
0
0
Which is the table that i find the history of events in shipment ?

i found the SS_STATUS_HISTORY_EVENT_GROUP and I_TRANSACTION tables but the description is the event is not there.
↧
↧

Equipment_Initial_Number as a Refnum

May 14, 2015, 1:12 pm
$
0
0
Hello- Has anyone created logic to pull the Equipment_Initial_Number as a Refnum onto a shipment? Specifically Drayage. Or at least the Equipment_Number or Equipment_Initial. Looking for a way to make this Automated via Agent work.
↧

Report Timeout Error

May 14, 2015, 11:05 pm
$
0
0
Hi

When we try to run the report, the report is not getting generated and we are getting the below error message.

Generic_Remote_Exception
[null] weblogic.rmi.extensions.RequestTimeoutException: RJVM response from 'weblogic.rjvm.RJVMImpl@52eb742b - id: '730792988831599868S:141.93.115.110:[7001,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1,-1]:Otmv633:gc3-otm-uat-app1' connect time: 'Sat May 09 23:02:25 CEST 2015'' for 'execDispatch(Ljava.lang.String;I[Ljava.lang.Object;Lglog.webserver.wrapper.BaseWrap per;)' timed out after: 600000ms.

We also tried sending the report to our email address but we are not receiving it.

Could you please help us on this?

Regards
Deepak.M
↧
Search

Rush hour getting populated inappropriately

May 14, 2015, 11:32 pm
$
0
0
Hi All

We have a shipment where rush hour is getting calculated even though the calendar is not defined for that particular day.

In our scenario, Shipment falls on Sunday ,which is not defined in the calendar for rush hour.

Checking the logs, we found that OTM is picking up the right lane, which depends upon the source and destination location of a shipment.

Could you please explain the concept of rush hour .
↧

Issue with Mixed pallet (Rainbow Pallet) optimization

May 15, 2015, 2:11 am
$
0
0
Hello Experts,

Request your opinion to know whether you have faced similar issue prior and is there any way out to resolve this case.

- Requirement was to find number of Ship units (Pallets) based on line items defined in Order.
- I have created Separate Order Release Configuration where mixed THU creation is allowed
- All other required setups were done for Mixed pallet config
- OTM is creating mixed pallet as expected
- However, if there are multiple line items with some quantity is leftover then OTM puts them all in same mixed pallet and not adhering to Weight, Volume or Packaging Reference Unit constraint of THU.

- Raised this case to oracle and they say its expected behavior because OTM treats mixed pallet as infinite bucket and all leftover quantity will be put in it.

- However, some research on oracle support shows, " Bug 17661448 - RAINBOW PALLET EXCEEDS VOLUME OF THU" . This contradicts to Oracle comment to treat Mixed pallet as infinite bucket.

Couple of questions

A) Is this really expected behavior or is there any way to decide count of mixed pallets

Eg.

1) 100 Carton_X (packaging Unit) can fit on Euro_Pallet (THU)
2) 150 Carton_Y (packaging Unit) can fit on same Euro pallet (THU)
3) 200 Carton_Z (packaging Unit) can fit on same Euro pallet (THU)

Above is defined by using PRU.

This gives OTM idea that

space occupied by 2 Carton_X = Space occupied by 3 Carton_Y = Space occupied by 4 Carton_Z. So proportion is 1 : 1.5 : 2

And we think, this should be the logic behind PRU concept.

Now if I have Order with line quantity as below

Line 1 => Carton_X => Quantity 107 =>>> 1 Full Pallet of 100 + 7 Carton_X
Line 2 => Carton_Y => Quantity 297 =>>> 1 Full Pallet of 150 + 147 Carton_Y
Line 3 => Carton_Z => Quantity 390 =>>> 1 Full Pallet of 200 + 190 Carton_Z


So Considering above Proportion of 1 : 1.5 : 2

7 Carton_X will be split as 2 + 5 and fit to remaining two partial quantities to make mixed full pallets as below:

147 Carton_Y + 2 Carton X (equivalent to 3 Carton_Y due to proportion) = 1 Mixed Pallet

190 Carton_Z + 5 Carton X (equivlent to 10 Carton_Z due to proportion) = 1 Mixed Pallet


So Overall it will be 3 Full Pallet + 2 Mixed Pallets and hence Ship Unit Count will be 5

Howver OTM's current behavior is 3 Full Pallet + 1 Mixed pallet for all leftover quantity.




B) What is the use of Packaging Reference Units if it unable to optimize and find count of mixed pallets required?


Though its bit lengthy post, request your opinion based on your experience with Mixed pallet configuration.

Thanks!!!
↧
↧

Pointing OTM 6.3.3 to newly created EBS instance

May 15, 2015, 9:02 am
$
0
0
Hi,
Recently in a non-prod environment, the EBS system was rebuilt and given new names and connect strings. I can find many documents regarding how to install and configure the integration between OTM and EBS, but cannot find a document that explains how to modify the integration when the EBS environment has changed.

Does such a document exist?

If not, do I just redeploy the payload.jar and then rerun the ANT scripts, or is there a simpler method.
Thanks,
Dan
↧

Calendar not being honored on first stop of a multistop with wait time on rate servic

May 15, 2015, 9:03 am
$
0
0
Hi All

Below is the issue that I'm facing in regards to a multi-stop.

Issue 1:

There are 2 orders going from BARBERTON,OH, US to
1st delivery stop: TUCSON AZ
2nd delivery stop: SAN DIEGO CA and has to be the same sequence.

Here, the client requirement is to pick up only on thursday and deliver it to 1st stop AZ on following Tuesday and then to CA on wednesday as per their current operations.

As per their input I've defined rate service of type simulation with 55MI per day of drive and with HOS as 11hrs drive and 13hrs rest. With a Max Wait Time Per Stop as 17hrs and Max Long Haul Wait Time of 2D 16hr and it uses rush hour (not sure on this Rush Hour)

While planning I've populated all the orders with Early Pickup Date, Late Pickup Date, Early Delivery Date and Late Delivery Date with (Pick up on Thursday and 1st stop delivery on following tuesday and last stop on wednesday) and made Date Emphasis as Both as all the orders should be picked on the same day but deliver as per the requirement. Source location has a calender starting from 7AM -2:30 PM Mon-Fri

However, when planned the shipment start time shows as 00:00:00 of Thursday or Planned Arrival Time of 00:00:00 and Planned Departure of 07:00:00 (which is as per calender). Though it is correct but I'm looking for shipment start time to be the beginning of the calender at source location i.e at 7:00 am.However, as I've defined the Max Allowed stop time as 17hrs it looks to be the cause.

I'm looking something which says that for first stop there is no wait time allowed or you can only come in when calendar opens so that shipment start time says 7:00 AM when warehouse opens.

Issue 2:

There is also another case where they have another stop of SAUK RAPIDS,MN

The sequence of Delivery is

SAUK RAPIDS,MN
TUCSON, AZ
SAN DIEGO,CA

Here, they have defined a multi-stop rate record with stop-off charges going from Barberton, OH to San Diego, CA. However, OTM doesn't plan SAUK RAPIDS,MN with this rate record, probably it thinks its too far away on the route and fails to build multi-stop as expected. But plan well onto a multistop when i broaden the lane from US to US than Barberton to San Diego but client says it has to plan through that defined rate as per carrier contract. So, I was looking out for a way or parameter that allows deviation on the route from what OTM determines the best and fails to build multistop.

Any valuable inputs would be of great help to me.

Regards
Prashanth
↧

Transmission Errors

May 18, 2015, 3:57 am
$
0
0
Hi Gurus,

i have created order in Ebs and send into OTM but iam unable to find out orders in order relase and i have check with transmission report its showing some errors, please find the attachement of report and guide me how to reslove the issue.

Attachment 1856


Thanks & Regards,
Chandrasekhar.
Attached Files
↧
Viewing all 2772 articles
Browse latest View live
Search